This review (2021) examines the usage and the meaning of the term ‘consciousness’ within psychedelic research and how theories of consciousness are operationalized to explain the effects of psychedelics in turn. Although psychedelics are unlikely to elucidate the biological basis for phenomenal consciousness (i.e. the hard problem), they are useful tools for investigating claims about the contents of consciousness, and their altered states.
“Psychedelic substances produce unusual and compelling changes in conscious experience which have prompted some to propose that psychedelics may provide unique insights explaining the nature of consciousness. At present, psychedelics, like other current scientific tools and methods, seem unlikely to provide information relevant to the so-called “hard problem of consciousness,” which involves explaining how first-person experience can emerge. However, psychedelics bear on multiple “easy problems of consciousness,” which involve relations between subjectivity, brain function, and behavior. In this review, we discuss common meanings of the term “consciousness” when used with regard to psychedelics and consider some models of the effects of psychedelics on the brain that have also been associated with explanatory claims about consciousness. We conclude by calling for epistemic humility regarding the potential for psychedelic research to aid in explaining the hard problem of consciousness while pointing to ways in which psychedelics may advance the study of many specific aspects of consciousness.”
Is your perception of the color red the same as mine? And how does our perception change under the influence of psychedelics? The study of/with psychedelics has given us some preliminary answers as to the content of consciousness. Under ‘altered states of consciousness’ we may experience a red rose with increased intensity, link different concepts, and even link multiple senses (synaesthesia).
What psychedelics don’t (yet) tell us much about is the so-called hard problem of consciousness. Although we can measure the level of changes (as we see in the paper above), we haven’t gained answers as to why we experience anything in the first place.
Enlightening quotes from this paper
- “At present, there is little reason to think that psychedelics will bring us any closer to closing the explanatory gap [between subjective experiences of being and objectively observable phenomena such as brain activity].”
- “Materialist theories, favored by many scientists, regard phenomenal consciousness as identical to brain states, [but] need to explain how physical processes (e.g., the brain) give rise to qualia,” the “what it feels like” quality of being conscious.”
- “It is possible that psychedelics will allow altered states of consciousness to follow a similar path of scientific inquiry as emotions by providing a reliable means to induce and influence them in controlled settings.”
The authors argue that psychedelics can play an important role in better understanding the ‘easy problem’ of consciousness. At the same time, they argue that psychedelics currently have not helped elucidate the ‘hard problem’ and don’t see how they could at this time.