Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement

This consensus statement (n=27) identifies key ethics and policy issues for integrating psychedelic therapies into clinical practice. It reports 20 points of consensus across 5 ethical issues, with relevant actors responsible for implementation, and highlights areas needing further research and deliberation.

Abstract of Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care

“Importance: As government agencies around the globe contemplate approval of the first psychedelic medicines, many questions remain about their ethical integration into mainstream medical practice.

Objective: To identify key ethics and policy issues related to the eventual integration of psychedelic therapies into clinical practice.

Evidence Review: From June 9 to 12, 2023, 27 individuals representing the perspectives of clinicians, researchers, Indigenous groups, industry, philanthbaropy, veterans, retreat facilitators, training programs, and bioethicists convened at the Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Prior to the meeting, attendees submitted key ethics and policy issues for psychedelic medicine. Responses were categorized into 6 broad topics: research ethics issues; managing expectations and informed consent; therapeutic ethics; training, education, and licensure of practitioners; equity and access; and appropriate role of gatekeeping. Attendees with relevant expertise presented on each topic, followed by group discussion. Meeting organizers (A.L.M., I.G.C., D.S.) drafted a summary of the discussion and recommendations, noting points of consensus and disagreement, which were discussed and revised as a group.

Findings: This consensus statement reports 20 points of consensus across 5 ethical issues (reparations and reciprocity, equity, and respect; informed consent; professional boundaries and physical touch; personal experience; and gatekeeping), with corresponding relevant actors who will be responsible for implementation. Areas for further research and deliberation are also identified.

Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement focuses on the future of government-approved medical use of psychedelic medicines in the US and abroad. This is an incredibly exciting and hopeful moment, but it is critical that policymakers take seriously the challenges ahead.”

Authors: Amy L. McGuire, I. Glenn Cohen, Dominic Sisti, Matthew Baggott, Yuria Celidwen, Neşe Devenot, Sabrina Gracias, Charles Grob, Ifetayo Harvey, Brent Kious, Mason Marks, Michael Mithoefer, Elizabeth Nielson, Dost Öngür, Alexandra Pallas, Andrew Peterson, Eduardo E. Schenberg, Paul Summergrad, Brett Waters, Monnica T. Williams & David B. Yaden

Summary of Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care