Ketamine Associated ACC GABA and Glutamate Change and Depression Remission

This is a feasibility study and the goal of this project is to evaluate whether peak ACC GABA and glutamate, quantified as a CSF-corrected absolute concentration percent change from baseline, is associated with clinical remission, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of <10, to the anti-glutamatergic antidepressant ketamine.

As MRS is expensive, we also aim to study a correlation between change in peripheral metabolites (GABA and glutamate) and central GABA and glutamate levels.

Status Enrolling by invitation
Results Published
Start date 01 March 2019
End date 12 January 2021
Chance of happening 100%
Phase Phase I
Design Open
Type Interventional
Generation First
Participants 20
Sex All
Age 18- 65
Therapy No

Trial Details

Aims: This feasibility study aims to better understand the neurobiology of major depression and how ketamine may therapeutically impact brain function. This research may provide important insights into the mechanism of ketamine response, thus, potentially increasing the likelihood of successful treatment interventions and decrease the number of ineffective treatments and/or risk for serious side effects. SPECIFIC AIMS: Utilizing novel dynamic sliding-window functional MR spectroscopy (fMRS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS), we aim to evaluate the relationship between GABA and glutamate (central-baseline to peak and peripheral-baseline to 24 hours) levels with a change in depression symptoms (baseline to 24 hours), after a single infusion of intravenous (IV) ketamine, in subjects with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

NCT Number NCT03573349

Sponsors & Collaborators

Mayo Clinic
This company doesn't have a full profile yet, it is linked to a clinical trial.

Measures Used

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
A ten-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in patients with mood disorders.

Data attribution

A large set of the trials in our database are sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG). We have modified these post to display the information in a more clear format or to correct spelling mistakes. Our database in actively updated and may show a different status (e.g. completed) if we have knowledge of this update (e.g. a published paper on the study) which isn't reflected yet on CTG. If a trial is not sourced from CTG, this is indicated on this page and you can follow the link to the alternative source of information.